Thursday, November 28, 2019

Thomas Paine “The American Crisis” Analysis Essay Essay Example

Thomas Paine â€Å"The American Crisis† Analysis Essay Paper Thomas Paine was celebrated for his political Hagiographas recommending the revolution. His rhetorical papers The American Crisis was really persuasive and influential. Some of Paine’s political thoughts were praised and some were argued. and his positions on faith made him an castaway. The American Crisis was a valuable work informing the American people that they owed no trueness to Britain and would merely last if all ties were to be severed wholly. His authorship was a major force behind the American Revolution. Paine had such a manner with words that he used three different techniques in his rhetorical papers to name Forth the support and nationalism of the settlers: comparison and contrasting. derision. and confidence-building. Paine’s authorship was meant to arouse indignation and support from the settlers. and to acquire them to contend for their freedom. by utilizing comparing and contrasting techniques. He wrote â€Å"†¦to suppose that He has relinquishe d the authorities of the universe. and given us up to the attention of devils† . which compared the British monarchy to Satans and showed Americans that the British were morally corrupt. We will write a custom essay sample on Thomas Paine â€Å"The American Crisis† Analysis Essay specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now We will write a custom essay sample on Thomas Paine â€Å"The American Crisis† Analysis Essay specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer We will write a custom essay sample on Thomas Paine â€Å"The American Crisis† Analysis Essay specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer Paine so equated freedom with overall contentment when he wrote â€Å"I am as confident. as I am that God governs the universe. that America will neer be happy till she gets clear of foreign rule. † He explained to the American settlers that they will neer be content until they rid themselves of the British. He reasoned with the settlers that because freedom peers felicity. they finally desired freedom. Paine got the point across without leaping around the issue or talking shyly about their state of affairs at that clip. Paine besides used derision to acquire support from the settlers. He ridiculed those who would curse commitment to Britain. or give in to them out of fright and cowardliness. He showed a great trade of brotherlike love and regard to the 1s who would stand up and battle for their cause. but wholly destroys any last scintillas of unity a coward would still hold when he said â€Å"The bosom that feels non now is dead ; the blood of his kids will cuss his cowardl iness. who shrinks back at a clip when a small might hold saved the whole. and made them happy. † Paine did non halt at that place. Alternatively. he went on to roast non merely the British authorities. but the really king himself. He called the male monarch â€Å"a common liquidator. a highjacker. or a house-breaker. † If the earnestness of his papers did non hit place with the settlers. it decidedly did when he made that statement. That was non something anybody would make in those yearss because roasting the British throne would be your life. If that was non plenty. he continued to murder the character of the male monarch by naming him â€Å"a sottish. stupid. stubborn. worthless. beastly adult male. † Paine non merely ridiculed the throne. but defiled it wholly. Pain used another technique to derive the support and nationalism of his fellow countrymen. even George Washington. by utilizing confidence-building techniques. He reminded the settlers that it was their responsibility to stand up for those who can non themselves. and gave them another ground to arise ag ainst the British. In this instance. it isn’t the hapless or socially incapacitated he campaigned on behalf of. but the future coevalss of America. â€Å"A generous parent should hold said. ‘If there must be problem. allow it be in my twenty-four hours. that my kid may hold peace. ’ and this individual contemplation. good applied. is sufficient to rouse every adult male to responsibility. † Making the settlers view every hereafter coevals of America as their really ain kids was a great manner to animate a sense of security and protection. and do them recognize what their forfeits would finally bring forth. He made his countrymen see that it would evidently be a really difficult route. but deserving every spot of attempt put forth by everyone when he said â€Å"he that stands it now. deserves the love and thanks of adult male and adult female. Tyranny. like snake pit. is non easy conquered ; yet we have this solace with us. that the harder the struggle. the more glorious the victory. † Wordss like these have a manner of transfusing a sense of pride in people who know that they are seeking to work for a common cause at a really high monetary value. Paine used these words to beef up the volitions of his countrymen and advance an firm integrity to contend for the cause that they came to this state for in the first topographic point. Likewise. he besides wrote to cons truct assurance in George Washington. He wanted to transfuse an Fe will into him when he said â€Å"Voltaire has remarked that King William neer appeared to full advantage but in troubles and in action ; the same comment may be made on General Washington. for the character fits him. † He besides wrote of the cowardliness of the Tories to hike assurance in George Washington when he said â€Å"And what is a Tory? Good God! what is he? I should non be afraid to travel with a 100 Whigs against a 1000 Tories. were they to try to acquire into weaponries. Every Tory is a coward ; for servile. slavish. self-interested fright is the foundation of Toryism ; and a adult male under such influence. though he may be cruel. neer can be brave. † Thomas Paine was a adult male who knew how to take words and explicate them into phrases that were merely every bit powerful as arms. He used three techniques to derive the support and nationalism of the settlers: comparison and contrasting. derision. and confidence-building. He was seeking to demo the settlers that they were contending to make a state of free work forces. and to go on any ties with the British would contradict all the work that already been done. and would do the lives that were already sacrificed be done in vain. Paine used his diction and phrasing in the right topographic point at the right clip. It is much to his recognition that America found its strength and stood up to contend for freedom. It might be certain actions by enemies that finally lead work forces into conflict. but it is words that fuel their motive and finding to force in front when they feel they have nil left to give.

Sunday, November 24, 2019

Free Essays on John Wilks Booth

John Wilkes Booth, born May 10, 1838, was an actor who performed throughout the country in many plays. He was the lead in some of William Shakespeare's most famous works. Additionally, he was a racist and Southern sympathizer during the Civil War. He hated Abraham Lincoln who represented everything Booth was against. Booth blamed Lincoln for all the South's ills. He wanted revenge. In late summer of 1864 Booth began developing plans to kidnap Lincoln, take him to Richmond (the Confederate capital), and hold him in return for Confederate prisoners of war. By January, 1865, Booth had organized a group of co-conspirators that included Samuel Arnold, Michael O'Laughlen, John Surratt, Lewis Powell (also called Lewis Paine or Payne), George Atzerodt, and David Herold. Additionally, Booth met with Dr. Samuel Mudd both in Maryland (where Mudd lived) and Washington, and he began using Mary Surratt's boardinghouse to meet with his co-conspirators. On March 17, 1865, the group planned to capture Lincoln who was scheduled to attend a play at a hospital located on the outskirts of Washington. However, the President changed plans and remained in the capital. Thus, Booth's plot to kidnap Lincoln failed. On April 9, 1865, General Robert E. Lee surrendered to General Ulysses S. Grant at Appomattox. Two days later Lincoln spoke from the White House to a crowd gathered outside. Booth was present as Lincoln suggested in his speech that voting rights be granted to certain blacks. Infuriated, Booth's plans now turned in the direction of assassination. On the morning of Friday, April 14, Booth dropped by Ford’s Theater and learned that the President and General Grant were planning to attend the evening performance of Our American Cousin. He held one final meeting with his co-conspirators. He said he would kill Lincoln at the theatre (he had since learned that Grant had left town). Atzerodt was to kill Vice-President Andrew Johnson at the Kirkwood Ho... Free Essays on John Wilks Booth Free Essays on John Wilks Booth John Wilkes Booth, born May 10, 1838, was an actor who performed throughout the country in many plays. He was the lead in some of William Shakespeare's most famous works. Additionally, he was a racist and Southern sympathizer during the Civil War. He hated Abraham Lincoln who represented everything Booth was against. Booth blamed Lincoln for all the South's ills. He wanted revenge. In late summer of 1864 Booth began developing plans to kidnap Lincoln, take him to Richmond (the Confederate capital), and hold him in return for Confederate prisoners of war. By January, 1865, Booth had organized a group of co-conspirators that included Samuel Arnold, Michael O'Laughlen, John Surratt, Lewis Powell (also called Lewis Paine or Payne), George Atzerodt, and David Herold. Additionally, Booth met with Dr. Samuel Mudd both in Maryland (where Mudd lived) and Washington, and he began using Mary Surratt's boardinghouse to meet with his co-conspirators. On March 17, 1865, the group planned to capture Lincoln who was scheduled to attend a play at a hospital located on the outskirts of Washington. However, the President changed plans and remained in the capital. Thus, Booth's plot to kidnap Lincoln failed. On April 9, 1865, General Robert E. Lee surrendered to General Ulysses S. Grant at Appomattox. Two days later Lincoln spoke from the White House to a crowd gathered outside. Booth was present as Lincoln suggested in his speech that voting rights be granted to certain blacks. Infuriated, Booth's plans now turned in the direction of assassination. On the morning of Friday, April 14, Booth dropped by Ford’s Theater and learned that the President and General Grant were planning to attend the evening performance of Our American Cousin. He held one final meeting with his co-conspirators. He said he would kill Lincoln at the theatre (he had since learned that Grant had left town). Atzerodt was to kill Vice-President Andrew Johnson at the Kirkwood Ho...

Thursday, November 21, 2019

The Life of Carl Theodor Dreyer Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

The Life of Carl Theodor Dreyer - Essay Example Before coming into the care of Danish Lutheran typographer Carl Theodor Dreyer and his wife Inger Marie at the age of two, the infant Nielsen was already placed in two foster homes. It should be noted that even before the adoption was finally legalized, the mother of Dreyer died after consuming a large dose of phosphorous in order to induce miscarriage as she was then pregnant again with her second child out of wedlock (Acquarello 1). The young Dreyer never got the opportunity of developing a good relationship with his foster parents as they constantly reminded him that his mother had neglected her social responsibilities. They have also expected that Dreyer will recompense them on their charity (Alleva 3). It is uncertain whether Dreyer had learned the story behind his true identity, yet this circumstance in his life has left a profound impact on the famous film director as evidenced by his filmography. What has become apparent is that Dreyer has endured a deep wound even if he avoids talking about his childhood and parental estrangement in his numerous interviews and public appearances (Acquarello 1). Dreyer excelled academically. ... He became a celebrity profiler for Scandinavian theater artists. He worked as a reporter in several prominent newspapers which include Berlingske Tindendi, Politiken, and Riget. Being a very talented writer, Dreyer captured the promising aviation industry by his "technically comprehensive articles." The Nordisk Film Company then employed him as a hot air balloon technical adviser. Dreyer started in the film industry by doing the titling and writing film scripts for a number of studios before signing an exclusive contract with Nordisk. Within this company, Dreyer had shown his exceptional skill in film editing. The encouragement and tutelage of Wilhelm Staehr became the stepping stone of Dreyer to venture into film directing (Acquarello 3). The first film of Dreyer created in 1918 was a "banal melodrama" entitled The President. Even in this first movie, the director already revealed his objective of creating a personal stamp in the movie industry. It should be noted that instead of selecting studio actors employed by Nordisk, Dreyer opted to respond to his artistic intuition by personally electing his own cast of professional and non-professional actors. Dreyer selected his artists for "their appropriate face types to the situational and psychological profile of the character that they portray" (Acquarello 3). The director also chose to create an atmosphere of realism and naturalness in his film by doling out cosmetics and ornately decorated sets. It is irrefutable that The President depicts an important issue in Dreyer's life. The film tackles the issue of a biological parents' moral responsibility for a child conceived out of wedlock. The story line is about "a prominent and well respected judge [who] is forced to decide the